SolomonSeries.com Building a Better
Informed World!
WOULD
YOU BUILD THE LARGEST STRUCTURE IN THE WORLD, THEN "FINISH" THE
INTERIOR POORLY?? WE SEE A ROUGH SURFACED INTERIOR IN THE
PYRAMID. WHY?
WOULD YOU BUILD THE WORLD'S LARGEST ROCK PILE TO HIDE YOUR PHARAOH AND
STICK HIM IN A BROKEN BOX IN AN UGLY PLACE??
WHY DON'T WE ASK THESE SIMPLE QUESTIONS?
Is it possible this beat up old
stone box (coffer) in the Upper Room ("King's Chamber") is in some way
related to a rock flipping concept? THINK ABOUT IT!!?
The
�King�s Chamber� or �Upper Room� of the Great Pyramid is one of
my favorites.There is
more truth by way of evidence revealed in that space of the Pyramid than
potentially any other.The
difficulty for modern man is that there is more deception spread about by
so-called �explorers� and �mystics� about this one room than any
other.If one can begin to
understand this room, they will find many of their other questions will be
answered in the other spaces.
Firstly, always remember the upper room (Erroneously called the King�s
Chamber) was found closed, completed sealed behind three layers of stone, and it was
EMPTY!There was never any
intention to leave treasure in this space and a quick simple look at the
space reveals:
1)A large
empty space with bare, simple, ugly walls.
2)High
overhead.
3)No
ventilation.That is right no
ventilation.The
channels/tubes are unfit for ventilation as I will explain.
4)The largest
stones in the entire structure are found in association with this room,
but the majority are only 3 foot by 3 foot approximately.
5)The large
unsupported room is made up of slabs of stone.
Let�s
start by showing you a picture.Since
very few have ever seen the room, they make up lies and myths about this
work space.You need to take
an honest look at it and remove the scales of deception placed by
pseudo-scientists who have failed to tell the truth.This is a truly stunning photo with detail that many need to see.Study this photo closely.I will address some of the finer points in the photo.
The
room is 17 feet wide, 34 feet long, and 19 feet high.It is made of smooth cut/broken stone that is unfinished.It is lined with pink granite, which makes up less than 2 percent
of the mass of the Great Pyramid.The
�filler� stone behind these walls and throughout the structure is
rough cut/broken locally quarried lime rock (NOT imported granite!)(Not
finely tooled or cut either!).
As
one can see from the photo there are 5 tiers of rock that make up the 19
foot height.By way of simple
calculation we find the rocks are less than 4 feet in height (19/5 = less
than 4 feet).Can you
�see� it?As we look across the back wall (west wall of the room) we
see the 17 foot span of the room width is made up of 3 or more irregular
length stones, therefore the average length of the stones is only 6 feet
or less (17/3= less than 6 feet).Many
are only 3 feet by 3 feet.LOOK!The stones are not gigantic.They
are relatively small.As one
can see the stones are not nearly as big as we are lead to believe, and I
can assure you these are some of the largest in the entire structure. See
the book The Solomon Series: Great Pyramid Mystery Resolved
where we address the stone sizes, handling cutting, etc.�����As we look
at the bulk/mass of the structure we see the majority are locally
quarried lime rock of less than 2.5 feet cubed, weighing only about 1800
pounds.Much of what we read focuses on the sensational rather than
the truthful.Focus on the
truth, because the Truth will set you free.
Before
going onwards, lets look back at the stone box found in the middle of the
floor of the upper room.Look
again at the photo above.Study
the stone box.Notice it is
about 7 feet long, and only as tall as one strake of stone behind it.The box is about 28 inches tall.Many people get all excited about this being a
�Coffin� or
�coffer� of some kind, but this cannot be true.It is a lie that Egyptologists, Archaeologists, etc spread out of
imagination only.There is no
indication whatsoever that this was ever used as a coffin.In fact there is indication it was never a
coffin����..Recall this was found in a completely sealed room that
was empty!?The only thing
found in the room besides this box was dust, salt, and dead bugs.(There
are reasons for these three elements in the room. Get my books!
Volume Two of the series uses a forensic approach to share the reason
for various findings in the strucure.)There were three sets of stone locking/blocking mechanisms to
prevent entry, and they were completely sealed.The idea that this is a sarcophagus (coffin) is a lie, plain and simple.It is the work of over active imaginations of people who know no
better.Mark those people as
low integrity, deceptive people.In this area one needs to begin to �mark� the illusionists and
understand who will lie to you and who will not.Many will.Be aware.
Look
closely at the erroneously labeled �coffer�.
The external appearance is rough and beaten up as if used in a
working environment.There
is/was no lid to the box.The
box was never carved in an ornate manner.It is ugly as it was designed to be.The top lip or edge of the box is rounded, not fitted.
Look at how severely the corner is broken on the box itself.What would it take to break/wear this corner this way?It would take dozens of impacts from very large, very heavy
objects, wouldn�t it?Look
closely at the box.Since
there was never a dead body in this room, and the room was sealed is it
likely this was simply a �tool� for building the structure?Look closely at the box.This �break� is not man-made, it is not simple, it is a
complicated breaking pattern from an extended mechanical operation.
As
we can see from the Inversion Tool drawing set this is a working tool, not
a burial device. Download now!
As we move
onwards look at the following drawing from the Smythe exploration in the
mid-1800�s.
From
the Smythe drawing we know that it took 9 slabs of stone to cover the
overhead.Since each stone is
approximately the same width we can likely assume the end �half�
stones will tell us the amount of coverage on each lip of the overhead we
have, which is 2 feet or so at each end.By looking at the �solid slabs� only we see seven solid slabs
and two half-slabs cover the roof for a total of eight slabs.Since the room is 34 feet long we can approximate the width of the
slabs by dividing 34 feet by 8 slabs, making each slab a little more than
4 feet wide.Since we know
the slabs are about 20 inches thick we can see that each one would fit
nicely into the inversion tool
(Which some erroneously call a "sarcophagus"), explaining the damages we see.
Now
look at the south wall of the drawing as represented in the fold out of
the drawing.The south wall
opposite the opening/doorway shows evidence of damage, impact, cracking,
etc.This is evidence of poor
handling and control of large rock slabs at the time of construction.As you look at our inversion tool drawing set we demonstrate how
the slabs would be moved in to the room from the north (Grand Gallery
ramp) and would likely impact the opposing wall.Notice only this wall has the impact and the impact pattern fits
perfectly with our mechanical drawing set.Note also, the height of the impact/damage.This height of impact fits perfectly with a room filled with two 20
inch slab sets, leveling the floor with the top of the �coffer�(Inversion
tool).Again, this confirms
our inversion tool drawings as likely the most accurate ever produced.
Notice
the flaws in the southwest wall.The
seals began to give way in this corner shortly after construction.The damaged seals as evidenced and known in the 1800�s was part
of the demise of the structure as discussed in Volume Two of the book, The
Solomon Series: Great Pyramid Mystery Resolved.
As
we examine the east wall in the drawing as an example we see the builders
used five stones to span the 17 foot width of the room, making the average
stone less that 4 feet is size.Further
since there is five tiers high in a 19 foot tall room the height of the
stones is less than 4 feet.The
graphic representation from over 150 years ago demonstrates the stones
aren�t nearly as big as we were once led to believe.Understand as well that these are the �liners� made of pink
granite.The locally quarried
lime rock behind these stones is believed to be haphazardly cut/stowed
irregularly broken and handled lime rock filler.As you explore our other evidences such as
the �niche� in the
erroneously labeled �Queen�s Chamber�, the
dig profile of
�Mamun�s Hole�, and other areas we see loose filler was used
throughout the structure.The use of irregular stone, mortar, etc is part of what has
allowed the structure to stand as long as it has.
at www.SolomonSeries.com
we see the errors of our past have had us measure the height of the spaces
in the pyramid based on the floor we stand on, or the overhead we see.Since this is stone construction, an engineer would measure these
slabs from the BOTTOM of the stone slab floor, and from the TOP of the
stone slab overhead.From an
engineering perspective the OUTER extremity of the stone rooms or liners
will reveal how and why the structure is there.In the past we became so enamored with the romanticized illusions
of past explorers we focused on the internal dimensions, when the key is
in the external dimensions of the space.See the text series at www.SolomonSeries.com
for full explanation and the mechanical/engineering significance.
As
we focus once again at the �inversion tool� or so-called �coffer�
we see the rough impact of multiple stone movements likely caused the
breakage to the corner.Further
research allows the viewer of this photo set to note the dust/lines in the
floors and stones of the space, relating them to the internals of the box.One can easily see the practical application of this stone
box as an inversion tool.
As
we look at the next photo we see that more than 100 years ago observation
was likely made that the box was too long for a coffer, and too narrow.Here we see a group of folks sitting on the inversion tool admiring
the space.What do you think
of the inversion tool now?No
dead bodies were ever here. The space
was found sealed behind three walls and empty. The "sarcophagus"
was found to be damaged by the original discovery, therefore it was
damaged during construction of the space...Possibly? The
"coffer idea"
is likely a hoax, isn�t it?
Here
is a close-up photo of the edge of the inversion tool/coffer.Notice it is not ornate, irregular cut, and the site of a work in
progress. This photo and the one above demonstrates heavy wear over an
extended time as if this was a construction tool, NOT a sarcophagus.
Here is the entry way into the "King's Chamber".
PLEASE UNDERSTAND this is a forced entry through a solid wall, wherein
the "explorers" broke out the rock sealing mechanism at their floor
level because it was the easiest route to penetrate to the space. The
opening forced by explorers is just about
the size of the "coffer" or
Inversion tool. Look at the walls and the small (low)
entry way. Not likely a tomb, is it? Once again we see an entry (hallway) that
shares an outer extremity/wall. Looks like a mechanical
consideration for moving slabs from up the ramp to into a room.
Nothing more.
Look
now at the photo which follows.The
current entry way is only as high as one tier of stone.It is likely formed by default well after the stone slabs
were installed above.Notice
also what is probably the largest stone set in the entire structure.Very few people are aware, but if you look at the north wall of the
upper room towards the Grand Gallery the second tier is the largest stone
set in the structure.Once
they loaded the floor two slabs high equaling the height of one tier of
stone (and/or height of the coffer), we see the opening in this wall would
have allowed maneuvering of the slabs into the room.
LOOK!The large stone
slab set on the north wall was likely erected AFTER the stone slabs for
the overhead were mobilized into the space, inverted, and landed
topside�����
The
findings in this unique research team that Ted has assembled will continue
to uncover and reveal hundreds of mysteries in virtually every text.The alignment tools employed are amazing.From stones, architecture, and archaeology, to Egyptology, social
issues, and theology.This is
the best, most level-headed, and grounded approach to ancient studies in
the world.Whidden and his team are setting a new standard for integrity
in the world, and the exploration field.
You may also go to our online
system for free electronic downloads, or for books in print purchase
products as they are available. Go to "Materials and Tools" to get the project started.
Egypt, Egyptian, Great
Pyramid, Giza Plateau, Giza Pyramids, Pyramid Drawings, Pyramid
Sketches, Pyramid Theory, Pyramid Construction, Pyramid Tombs,
Pyramidology, Pyramid Alignments, celestial alignments, Pyramid Mystery,
Great Pyramid Solved, Khufu, Cheops, Khafre, Robert Schoch, Professor
Robert Schoch, Jean-Pierre Houdin, Steven Myers, Ron Wyatt, Sir Flinders Petrie,
William Petrie, Egyptian Archaeology, Egyptian Pyramids, Egyptian
Pharaohs, Ancient Egypt, Pyramid Text, Great Architect, Freemason,
Freemasonry, archeology, Egyptology, Sphinx, Great Sphinx, Atlantis,
Atlantean